Why Can't I Login To Fafsa

The waiver of all relevant structures of meaning so far has begun!

The social reality itself is not kalkuelfaehig and only himself in the moment of transformation available

(Paul Koop)

... claimed by representatives of objective hermeneutics, object of algorithmic recursive sequence analysis is the social reality.

this assertion is wrong .. and not by permanent repetition correctly. is wrong also analyzed by representatives of objective hermeneutics assertion that algorithmic recursive sequence analysis of social reality "with strings". how should that work?

correctly however, is: first

the recursive algorithm sequence analysis assumed explicitly that the social reality calculus is not capable.

second object of algorithmic recursive sequence analysis are terminal discrete strings and nothing else. third a terminal discrete string is then interpreted correctly, if at least one formal
can languages that
the terminal string defined.

it will proceed as follows:

-the falling structure (an interaction, a building, a machine, a traffic flow, etc) is logged (buildings and machines are already in the limit of their own protocols, hardware, world 1),
- the protocols are semantically non-specific. It is assumed that they as a finite string (software, world 3)
institution of meaningful
are (syntax, control system, formal languages, software, world-3). is lesartenproduktion lesartenfalsifikation sequence and sequence-agency body for informal generates the control system. (At this point listen to the objective hermeneutics to the interpretation. For here begin meaningful structures such accrued
rules as defined algorithms
from to increase latency. Just but because of their latency-the structures to function in everyday life. Therefore be produced here resistors the structures hold in everyday life successfully latent. at this point it would be necessary to carry on structures and the latent, in the sense of control algorithms to formalize Final structure in order to bring them from latency. do not do this step the objective hermeneutics. which forced the latent structures too large. therefore contribute to this body's interpretation of objective hermeneutics to the casual reader as drehbuecher for a cabaret performance. This is not because of the lack of the interpretation goods as, but is
expressive of affected daily life structures
which prevents structures the impending unveiling deferred.)
will settle-in a K-translates (in ars defined formal language to see ars) and thus finally got out of their latency and objectified (K-systems: First I have to do semi-systems incorporated Chomsky hierarchy, phrase structure grammar and dialogue grammars, to dealing with formal languages to learn. these formal languages are each due to their bottom up / top down perspective and their latent psychologisms for formalization of genetic structuralism inappropriate. then I have worked extensively with L-systems in order to practice the visual interpretation of strings. until then I have developed the K-systems. to phrase structure grammar in contrast, dialogue grammars and L systems, they model the temporal structure of diachronic sequences of discrete nodes selection of rules which synchronic in the sense of a selection algorithms for the selection of next node a finite set of events to choose depending on the prior event. Subjects follow in any meaningful sense of control algorithms in the sense of this. searched is thus a context-free formal language, which left to the right each selection node generated at time t from the selection node at time t-1. subjective goals are contrary neither accessible nor intersubjectively calculus capable. Here each node selection is a pointer to another K-systems, so that K-systems are recursively nested into each other and can be like a microscope zooming into the case structure. Moreover, the K-systems are not designed to generate an optimal simulation tool, but in the colloquial language formulated in the closed and model immunized against falsifikationsversuche genetic structuralism. deficiencies in K-systems are defects of genetic structuralism, which would not have the genetic structuralism can be clear.)
is-on a computer-implemented with the generated K-system, a simulation (in LISP, C + +, Java, Pascal or any other programming language that is strong enough, the algorithms and data structures to map) (I have for this purpose a variety of tested models and techniques. here are cellular algorithms machines, neural networks, genetic, alpha-beta model and formal language have been written. ultimately, I chose the recursive algorithm sequence analysis feur a formal language chosen. because it really is not about the social, but strings to texts, finite discrete. I then programmed in PASCAL, LISP, JAVA and C + +. because programming is a very creative and imaginative activity, I have some of the source code on my webspace provided for download. It is also a small artificial world social, CUMOS an artificial biotope ("frog pond"), a retina simulation and a small chess program while
see here
)
-the result of the simulation, a terminal string, is translated protocol into a ,
-the artificially generated protocol is its correlation with empirical protocols examined
-corrections are needed at the K-system and repeatedly made the investigation.
4th at any terminal string can be defined any number of formal languages. 5th has proven time being a found formal language then can be demonstrated that the formal language of this artificial terminal strings to the terminal string correlate examined initially was designed for the formal language. ... any other representation, especially
the claim that the algorithm have recursive sequence analysis, object to the social reality, is simply wrong
. grossly deeply misleading and malicious intentions is supported by the finding that the formalization will not go even beyond a basal formal language. more is required. The genetic structuralism assumes a discrete chain of selection nodes. At each time t is this rule-guided selection of the node t through the selection node t +1 replaced. corresponding to a context-free formal language, which applies at the time t on the selection node t, the transformation rules. The chain of nodes is the selection protocol.




http://www.paul-koop.de/index.php?ID=3